Road Safety News
 

Government announces 'tough' measures for drink drivers

Thursday 22nd November 2012

A package of measures to crack down on drink drivers was unveiled last week by Stephen Hammond, road safety minister.

Included in the proposals are plans to remove the statutory right to a replacement blood or urine test where a breath test reading is above and close to the legal limit. This measure closes the loophole which allows those testing positive in breath to attempt to sober up while they wait for a blood or urine sample to be taken.

The Government also intends to legislate to allow police the option not to perform a preliminary breath test following the rollout of roadside evidential breath testing devices, and to give registered health care professionals greater roles in testing drink drivers. Both of these options are designed to speed up the enforcement process and deal with more drink drivers.

Stephen Hammond said: “We have made great progress in tackling drink drivers and the 2011 fatality figure for drink and drive accidents is the second lowest ever recorded.

“However, last year 280 people died ruining the lives of families up and down the country so more needs to be done to eradicate this menace. That is why we are taking forward a package of measures to streamline enforcement against drink driving.

“I am determined to make the jobs of those who deal with drink drivers easier and less bureaucratic so that bringing offenders to justice is not left to chance.”

Currently, drivers who record less than 50 microgrammes of alcohol per 100 millilitres of breath have the right to demand a blood or urine test - despite being over the legal limit of 35 microgrammes per 100 millilitres. This is known as the statutory option. This option dates back to the original introduction of breathalyser technology when there were concerns over reliability.

In his review of drink and drug driving, Sir Peter North recommended the removal of the right to demand a blood or urine test as evidence showed people were using it as a delaying tactic. The Government also believes that improvements in the accuracy of technology means that this option is no longer necessary.

Other proposals within the plans include: commissioning further research into the current process used to decide whether a driver banned due to drink driving can regain their licence; and further exploration of how greater use can be made of vehicle forfeiture powers to get the most dangerous and irresponsible motorists off the road, including drink drivers.
 

Responding to the proposals, Neil Greig, IAM director of policy and research, said: “With 'beat the breathalyser' pills legally on sale in the UK and a disproportionate number of younger drink-drivers, I'm worried that drink-driving could be losing its stigma.

“These proposals are very welcome but must be accompanied by higher-profile drink-driving campaigns, and not just at Christmas. Drivers need to know about the devastating consequences of drink-driving and drink-drivers need to know that they will be caught and punished.”

The Government has also announced a consultation on the legislative changes it proposed in its response to the reports by Sir Peter North and the Transport Select Committee on drink and drug driving. 

Click here to view the consultation which runs until 2 January 2013.

Click here to read the full DfT press release about the new drink drive measures it has unveiled today.

Comments

Comment on this story
Report a reader comment

What's your view - comment on this story:

I confirm that I have read and accept the moderation policy and house rules relating to comments posted on this website.
Your comment:
Your name and location:
Your email:

The DSA syllabus for learner drivers contains all manner of things which suggest a vast amount of drink drive information is given to learner drivers by instructors. As a DDR course trainer we find alarming gaps in their knowledge, hence the reason they got caught out. Have to agree with previous comments, no enforcement no gains. Roy, DDR course trainer and ex police inspector, Herts.
roy larter

Agree (2) | Disagree (0)
+2

You will actually need police officers to enforce whatever measures are put in place. These seem to be a disappearing species. The view from a retired Roads Policing Officer, and one who works for an organisation providing Drink/Drive re-hab courses.
Richard. Bedfordshire

Agree (6) | Disagree (0)
+6

Having engaged with the public and young-drivers regarding drink-driving their attitude is "...they are cutting the police force so chances of getting caught are lower than ever...". These proposals mean next to nothing when people believe they will not get caught. It remains hugely disappointing (and mind-blowing) that our Government still refuse to reduce the actual drink-drive limit.
Trudi, Birmingham

Agree (9) | Disagree (1)
+8

These proposals are a positive step forward, which I welcome, along with the consultation. I also 100% agree with Dave, however also feel these proposals are still not enough and do not go as far as they should.

The proposals seem to make it easier to prosecute suspected drink drivers, once they have been caught. If the Government seriously wants to reduce the number of drink drivers, and therefore (in theory) casualties, on the road, then changing fundamental attitudes and behaviours before people learn to drive is the answer.
Mike, from award winning http://dontbethatsomeone.co.uk (London)

Agree (4) | Disagree (1)
+3

Any chance of these tough new measures including more roads policing officers? If there's little chance of detection people will continue to take their chances.
Dave, Leeds

Agree (18) | Disagree (1)
+17