Road Safety News
 

PACTS report calls for closer working between road safety, sustainable transport and public health

Tuesday 1st April 2014

Central Government and local authorities need to “dramatically step up” road safety measures if levels of walking and cycling are to be increased without a rise in casualties, according to PACTS.

The claim comes in a report by the Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety (PACTS) published on the first anniversary (1 April) of the return to local government of responsibility for public health.

The report - Achieving Safety, Sustainability and Health Goals in Transport – comprises a study of expert opinion across road safety, sustainable transport and public health sectors. It concludes that while progress has been made in terms of working more closely together, much more is needed, particularly in the face of further government spending cuts.

The report says that concerns about obesity and poor air quality, the need to reduce carbon emissions and a heightened interest in cycling have boosted investment in local sustainable transport. At the same time, road safety funding cuts and reductions in the number of people killed or injured on the roads have led many local authorities to merge a reduced road safety staff with sustainable travel teams.

The report argues that “road safety needs to be pursued in a broad multi-sectoral context since it cuts across public health and sustainable transport (as well as occupational health and safety) agendas”. It goes on to suggest that more needs to be done “to make people feel safer so that the public health agenda and the public’s aspirations for safer mobility can be fulfilled”.

A summary of the report says: “Despite the statements of common policy objectives, there is still insufficient alignment between these sectors in practice to realise the substantial co-benefits of coordinated action.

“Public health and sustainable transport emphasise the health and environmental benefits of walking and cycling while the road safety profession is concerned that insufficient effort and investment are being made to prevent death and serious injury, and that increases in these vulnerable modes may lead to more casualties. Closer integration and synergy at national and local level is needed.

“While cycling has become the poster-boy of sustainable transport, walking lags behind, despite its much wider potential appeal and benefits. It is also a higher priority for casualty reduction.

“This report calls on the Government to show more leadership and joined-up working at national level and to recognise that the desired changes (healthier lifestyles, more active travel, safer road use) will require long-term planning and investment in physical infrastructure.

“It is imperative that the efforts to encourage walking and cycling are accompanied by safer infrastructure provision, effective speed management and improved road user training.”

The report also calls for the Departments of Transport and Health to jointly publish improved information about walking and cycling journeys and the health benefits and risks of the main travel modes. At local level it recommends a series of measures to improve cross-sector working and understanding.

David Davies, PACTS’ executive director, said: “The return of public health to local government has presented a tremendous opportunity to achieve better road safety, more active travel and healthier people and towns.

“Given the further cuts in local government spending that are on the way, working together may be the only way for these services to survive and deliver results.

“Government has set out policies to reduce casualties, encourage walking and cycling and tackle obesity. But they have not backed them with sufficient action or joined-up working in Whitehall.

“If safety is not improved through safer infrastructure provision, effective speed management, improved road user training and other measures, more walking and cycling may lead to more casualties on Britain’s roads.”

PACTS
The Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety (PACTS) is a registered charity and an associate Parliamentary Group. Its charitable objective is "to protect human life through the promotion of transport safety for the public benefit".

Comments

Comment on this story
Report a reader comment

What's your view - comment on this story:

I confirm that I have read and accept the moderation policy and house rules relating to comments posted on this website.
Your comment:
Your name and location:
Your email:

With the return of Public Health to local authorities and all sorts of initiatives developing to find better ways of working, especially links between disciplines, we may see such a move somewhere. There is certainly a growing amount of collaboration and shared funding between Highways, Health and,increasingly, Police and Crime Commissioners and Safety Partnerships towards shared aims and that is good to see. But beware the unintended consequences that could come from the move Rod suggests - do we really want to take the ETP and human factors expertise out of Highways Engineering or Transport Planning departments? Don't underestimate the effectiveness of having these complimentary but very different disciplines working together. Personally, I think we might lose more than we gained.
Honor Byford, Chair, RSGB

Agree (2) | Disagree (0)
+2

I'm really pleased that the report acknowledges that walking is not getting the policy attention it warrants. All of the activity and focus around cycling is positive but should not be at the expense of walking.
Nadeem - Greater Manchester

Agree (4) | Disagree (0)
+4

Now that Public Health is a local authority responsibility I wonder if there would be a benefit from road safety professionals moving to public health rather than in the traffic departments of local authorities. I would be interested in any insider views.
Rod King 20's Plenty for Us

Agree (2) | Disagree (19)
-17