Helmet-less cyclists must share blame for injuries, rules judge
A High Court judge has ruled that cyclists are partly to blame for their injuries if they fail to wear a helmet, even if the accident was not their fault (Times Online).
The ruling, which has caused consternation in the cycling world, could see damages for injuries cut by 15%. Critics believe it could be a backdoor means of forcing cyclists to wear helmets.
The judge ruled on a case brought by Robert Smith, who was riding in Brightlingsea, Essex, in 2005 when a motorcycle collided with his bicycle. As a consequence, Mr Smith sustained a serious brain injury.
He had not been wearing a cycle helmet and Mr Justice Griffith Williams ruled: “There can be no doubt that the failure to wear a helmet may expose the cyclist to risk of greater injury…any injury sustained may be the cyclist’s own fault.”
Click here to read the full Times Online news report.
New website includes members’ portal and info on training courses etc
Apply for Corporate Membership of Road Safety GB
Road Safety campaigns, research, data and help forum
The 2017 National Road Safety Conference
For more info and to register to attend click here...
Project EDWARD - 21 September 2017
For more info click here...
AROUND THE WEB
In the fast lane
For the Volvo Group, managing speed is one of the basics of traffic safety, but there’s more to it than just staying within the speed limits.
Mobile phone penalties double - but will it be an effective deterrent?
Edward Seaman, assistant editor of Road Safety News, reviews the change in legislation and its potential to influence behaviour.
The driving test trial
The findings of a DVSA trial, conducted with the Transport Research Laboratory (TRL), released to coincide with the new driving test changes.
Highways England's vehicle checks campaign
Click here to subscribe for weekly news alert