New scheme to ‘revolutionise’ lorry safety

09.04 | 31 October 2019 | | 4 comments

A new standard to protect vulnerable road users from the ‘most dangerous’ heavy goods vehicles by minimising blind spots has officially launched in London.

Under the Direct Vision Standard, HGVs will be categorised depending on the level of a driver’s direct vision from a cab – with a rating between ‘zero-star’ (lowest) and ‘five-star’ (highest).

Only vehicles rated ‘one-star’ and above, or those that have comprehensive safety systems, will be able to operate in London from October 2020. From 2024, the minimum requirement will be raised to ‘three-star’.

HGVs that do not meet the required Direct Vision Standard star rating will need to improve their overall safety through the introduction of ‘Safe System’ measures such as cameras, sensors and audible warnings.

HGVs that fail to meet new minimum safety standards will be issued a penalty charge for driving in the Capital.

HGV operators will have to apply for a permit via an online portal, which became live when the standard launched on 28 October.

Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, has described the scheme as ‘world-leading’ – adding that blind spots are proven to be a leading cause of pedestrian and cyclist deaths and serious injuries.

Mr Khan said: “I’m proud of our world-leading plans to remove the most dangerous lorries from London’s streets. 

“So many of the tragic deaths on our roads involve HGVs and this new scheme will help save lives.

“Forward-looking businesses have already been choosing safer vehicles in the run up to HGV safety permits becoming available. 

“The scheme has gone live and operators now have 12 months to upgrade their fleets, helping make our streets much safer for people walking and cycling.”

Christina Calderato, TfL’s head of transport strategy and planning, said: “We have reached a major milestone in a scheme that will save people’s lives and play a significant role in helping us achieve Vision Zero. 

“Transforming the safety of HGVs will dramatically reduce road danger for people walking and cycling, helping us to ensure that everyone gets home safely every day.”


 

Comments

Comment on this story

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Report a reader comment

Order by Latest first | Oldest first | Highest rated | Lowest rated

    Too many road users don’t think. A lorry driver and a cyclist in close proximity near a junction both need to think and plan. If neither think, then the risk of collision is high – if only one party thinks, they can compensate for the other’s mistake. The one in control of the larger, bulkier, faster more dominant vehicle (any motorised vehicle) has to do a lot of thinking!


    Hugh Jones
    Agree (2) | Disagree (0)
    +2

    The deep screen goes a long way to eliminating a key factor (where the Class 6 mirror so often fails by relying on the driver using it) and deep side glazing does likewise for the Class 5 mirror.

    For the pedestrian and cyclist this clear view of the driver also helps, and enables non verbal signalling – and checks that the driver has seen you and acknowledged this.

    BUT and this is a very big one for over 80% of fatal cycle-HGV collision in London (and a similar picture for pedestrians) the fatal injuries would be largely eliminated if the victims were prevented from a) going down & under the FRONT if the truck (some have a gap here of over 40cm!), and b) then going under the wheels (at 9-10T per axle)

    Objective analysis also highlights the common factors of sub standard junction geometry, which requires a driver to ‘negotiate’ an agreed deferrence of priority from other road users, so that the truck can be driven into oncoming traffic or cut in through traffic in an adjacent lane, whilst the user with priority yields.

    Thus can be especially risky on full lock left turns, where the n/s A pillar and mirrors totally obscure a steradian zone, which the truck will be driven through, as the turn is made.


    Dave Holladay, Glasgow
    Agree (3) | Disagree (0)
    +3

    HGV’s aren’t inherently dangerous, it’s these vulnerable road users that seem to be attracted to them like flies to fly paper.


    David Brown, Sheffield
    Agree (5) | Disagree (8)
    --3

    This is great news. I’d there work too, to encourage road users to recognise and avoid blind spots?


    Ben Graham, Reading
    Agree (2) | Disagree (1)
    +1

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close