IAM draws parallel between KSI increases and budget cuts

12.00 | 5 July 2012 | | 3 comments

At a time when road safety budgets where slashed by £23m, 50 councils in England saw an increase of more than 10% in killed and seriously injured (KSI) casualties between 2010 and 2011, according to the IAM.

The IAM analysis of DfT figures reveals that the biggest increases were seen in St Helens (62%), Portsmouth (57%), Stoke on Trent (57%), and Coventry (51%). A further 76 councils saw increases in the KSI rate above the national average of 2%.

The IAM says that local councils in England slashed their road safety budgets by 15% (£23m) last year, compared to average spending cuts of just 6% for other council services.

In London, Croydon witnessed the biggest increase in KSIs, where figures rose from 87 in 2010 to 109 in 2011, while in Bexley KSIs decreased from 68 in 2010 to 49 in 2011 – the largest decrease in the Capital.

The Association of British Drivers used the IAM analysis to highlight the 57% casualty rise in Portsmouth, where a 20-mph zone has been introduced. The ABD concludes that “the expenditure of over £500,000 of taxpayers’ money on this scheme was a total waste of money” and that “the money should have been spent on other road safety measures that are known to be effective”.

Simon Best, IAM chief executive, said: “It is concerning that road deaths and serious injuries rose last year. Road accidents usually drop during an economic recession, so this rise after continuous reductions over the last 10 years is particularly concerning.

“Ministers should take this as a serious warning. Cutting road safety education and reductions in local authority spending suggest that road safety isn’t a major priority for this Government. We need targets on reducing casualties for local councils so that performance can be checked. This would help make sure that councils look at new and innovative ways to save lives on our roads.”

For more information contact the IAM on 020 8996 9777.


Comment on this story

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Report a reader comment

Order by Latest first | Oldest first | Highest rated | Lowest rated

    No, causation factors change very little year by year.

    Please refer to my comments a week ago, and those of others, complaining about those who claim to see causal links where none exist, and to see specific explanations for what is usually nothing more than random variations and regression to the mean.

    The IAM analysis is nonsense of the same kind – it is literally impossible to find any meaningful and quantitative relationships between changes in funding and changes in road accidents, especially over just one year. And in any case, surely funding was cut considerably in 2010 when numbers fell sharply?

    Idris Francis Petersfield
    Agree (0) | Disagree (0)

    Interesting to read that about the 20 mph zones. So IAM is saying they are a total failure!

    Adam, Hants
    Agree (0) | Disagree (0)

    It would be interesting to see if causation factors have changed compared to previous years – has there been an increase in vehicle defects causing collisions? Has poor weather had an effect? Having some idea of the reasons behind the increase would be useful.

    Dave, Leeds
    Agree (0) | Disagree (0)

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.