‘Urgent’ action needed on shared space schemes

12.00 | 27 April 2017 | | 2 comments

A new report has urged the Government to call a halt on new shared space schemes, and undertake an urgent review of those already in place.

Published on Tuesday (25 April), the Women and Equalities Committee report recommends a moratorium until the Government produces ‘clear national guidance that explicitly addresses the needs of disabled people’.

The term ‘shared space’ covers a variety of schemes that remove street furniture, often taking out crossings, road markings and curbs on the principle it creates a safer road environment.

However, the Women and Equalities Committee report points to evidence which it says suggests that these schemes are excluding disabled people.

The report says the guidance should ‘instruct local authorities that controlled crossings and regular height kerbs are to be retained and that they should undertake an urgent review of existing schemes, working with disabled people… to identify the changes that are necessary and practicable’.

Lord Holmes of Richmond MBE, a blind former paralympic swimming champion and long-term campaigner against shared spaces, told the Transport Network website that he was ‘delighted’ with the outcome of the inquiry.

Launched in August 2016, the Committee’s inquiry sought to explore ways to improve access and inclusion for disabled people in built up areas, including a focus on shared spaces. The report urges the Government not to ‘shy away’ from the debate on shared spaces, but instead to ‘take leadership’.

The Committee says the guidance should also lay down consistent national standards so that disabled people can navigate, learn and independently use such schemes anywhere in the country, and make it clear that safety and usability requirements, such as controlled crossings and kerbs, are not optional.

Lord Holmes, who gave evidence to the Committee’s inquiry, told Transport Network: “I’m delighted that the committee agree with my recommendation that a moratorium on shared space schemes is necessary. Local authorities require clarity in this space and the exclusion of people from their communities and potential waste of public money must end.

“The impact on people’s lives when public spaces are not accessible is devastating. Inclusive design must be the golden thread that runs through all new buildings and works in the public realm.”

© Copyright Neil Owen and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence.



Comment on this story

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Report a reader comment

Order by Latest first | Oldest first | Highest rated | Lowest rated

    Delighted by this report – and in particular at long last the recognition of the severity of the issues. In my city members of our Access group now avoid and some travel to other towns to shop. Let’s hope Govt responds and we can work together to produce streets that are positive and safe for all.

    Sally Williams Leicester
    Agree (0) | Disagree (0)

    Woonerfs may be a good idea within certain countries within Europe but it appears they do not look after or consider their disabled as we do.

    Bob Craven Lancs
    Agree (0) | Disagree (0)

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.