Swindon MP recognised for young driver campaigning

12.00 | 17 December 2013 | | 3 comments

Justin Tomlinson, MP for Swindon North, has been given a road safety award by the charity Brake for his work campaigning to reform the way young people learn to drive.

Mr Tomlinson launched his campaign earlier this year after two crashes in Swindon killed three teenagers within the space of a week.

Working to highlight the issue in Parliament, Mr Tomlinson introduced the Graduated Driving Licence Scheme Bill on 19 June 2013. The Bill proposed that for 12 months immediately after passing their tests, drivers would have licence restrictions to limit the risks they are exposed to. This would include a zero-tolerance drink drive limit and only being allowed to carry one passenger. These restrictions would be supported by graduated learning, with key skills signed off by an accredited instructor before being allowed to book a test.

Mr Tomlinson consulted widely with emergency services, the insurance industry, Driver Instructors Association, and Brake. He also repeatedly met with transport ministers Stephen Hammond and Robert Goodwill, raised questions about young road deaths in Parliament, and wrote about the issue in local press and the Conservative Home blog.

He secured cross-party support for the Bill from a number of MPs and it was due to have its second reading on 25 October. However, there was not enough time to debate the Bill and a new date has not yet been announced.

Mr Tomlinson has been invited to submit his research and proposals for consideration alongside the Government’s forthcoming green paper on young drivers.

Julie Townsend, Brake deputy chief executive, said: "Brake fully endorses Justin’s campaign for graduated driver licensing, an approach we believe is critical to reducing the appalling numbers of young lives cut short and changed forever on our roads.

"Young drivers are more at risk because of a deadly combination of inexperience, overconfidence and peer pressure. Introducing them to the roads gradually, through a minimum learning period and restrictions for novice drivers, has been proven to drastically reduce these risks."

Justin Tomlinson said: "With four young people a day either killed or seriously injured on our roads, it is vital we take steps to allow young drivers to gain essential driving experience under lower risk conditions. I will continue to press on this issue as not only will it improve safety, but it will also bring down sky-high insurance premiums for young drivers.”


Comment on this story

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Report a reader comment

Order by Latest first | Oldest first | Highest rated | Lowest rated

    Einstein once said that doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is a sure sign of insanity and so it is with GDL. If young drivers are crashing then it is a very good indicator that it is their training that is part of the problem and to promote more training as the solution is quite bizarre.

    If the training is wrong then it is the training not the student that has to be ‘fixed’ before doing anything else. GDL maintains an unwarranted degree of faith in the current training system by pushing the blame for accidents onto the very people who are at the sharp end of those failures.

    Duncan MacKillop, Stratford on Avon
    Agree (0) | Disagree (0)

    Dr Sarah Jones is one of the UK’s leading experts on GDL. She has been campaigning for the introduction of GDL for drivers for a number of years. She presented at the National Conference last month – you can find her presentation here:

    Dr Jones also prepared a briefing document on GDL in October 2010, which can be found in the Road Safety Knowledge Centre here:

    Dr Jones’ work relates to drivers, not riders, as far as I’m aware.

    Nick Rawlings, editor, Road Safety News
    Agree (0) | Disagree (0)

    The only reasonable research on GDL at least from the motorcycling point of view has been carried out by Monash university who suggest that any safety benefits of an upgraded motorcycle licensing and training regime probably result more from exposure reduction (a reduction in the total amount of riding) than from crash risk reduction. In other words a more complicated training and testing regime means fewer people take up motorcycling which leads to fewer crashes. Is GDL for car drivers going to have a similar result, or does the good Mr Tomlinson know something I don’t?

    Duncan MacKillop, Stratford on Avon
    Agree (0) | Disagree (0)

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.