
A much better understanding of what exactly a ‘rural road’ is could help cut the number of people killed and seriously injured on them each year, according to a new study.
Government statistics show that of the 1,558 road deaths in Britain in 2021, 981 (63%) were listed as occurring on rural roads – that is; outside of a town or city.
However, 649 of these deaths took place not on the twisting country lanes typically associated with being a rural route, but on motorways (86 deaths) and A roads (563 deaths).
Work for the RAC Foundation, carried out by Agilysis, has taken the first steps in breaking down rural roads into several subcategories so that crashes can be better understood, and money better spent to reduce crashes and mitigate their effects when they do occur.
The researchers decided on a range of road characteristics to meaningfully divide rural roads, including: width, traffic flow, traffic type, speed limit, gradient, markings and location.
They then compared and contrasted the characteristics of a sample group of 483 sections of rural roads (not including motorways) which measured 1,563km in total. The routes were also appraised by a highway engineer.
Following this the study team identified four main categories of rural road:
- Principal roads – generally wide, fast moving and flat, sometimes dual carriageway, often close to populated areas
- Country roads – narrower, sometimes undulating, single-carriageway with moderate traffic levels
- Neighbourhood roads – through rural communities
- Winding roads – narrow single carriageways, mostly unclassified and sometimes single track, generally low speed and with little traffic
These four categories were then further divided to give a total of ten separate, identifiable types of rural road varying from the busiest and fastest dual carriageways all the way through to hill passes and remote roads.
Steve Gooding, director of the RAC Foundation, said: “The question may seem simple: ‘what is a rural road?’ The answer turns out to be more complex than you might think when interpreting road safety statistics.
“This report suggests there are at least ten types of ‘rural’ road with specific characteristics, and the only thing they have in common is that they run outside our big towns and cities.
“The risk is that the catch-all term ‘rural road’ has hidden a multitude of different highway types, each of which poses its own range of road safety challenges.
“The better we understand our roads and the risks users face on them, the better targeted our decisions on when and where to spend money will be.
“New, standardised categories would allow the dozens of police forces, hundreds of councils and any number of road safety professionals to use a common terminology to compare experiences and deploy those interventions most likely to reduce risk.”
Bruce Walton, one of the researchers, and technical director of Agilysis, said: “This study is an opportunity to tackle a long-standing challenge in road safety: how to address road danger on rural routes, which are easily overlooked because they are lightly trafficked or run through remote areas.
“The report outlines a mechanism to help engineers and blue light services do this more effectively. It also proposes a practical process which could deliver it, creating the prospect of further research to develop a coherent national approach that provides valuable insight into our sometimes-neglected rural road network.”
A very useful report. It shows how unhelpful the term “rural roads” is. Improving safe on rural roads was one of the four priorities in the DfT’s 2019 Road Safety Statement.
Useful measure included..
“We are well aware that in rural areas, there are concentrations of small wild animals on the road, which can be a road safety issue. Our new small mammal sign is intended to improve road safety by alerting road users to the presence of these animals.”
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/817695/road-safety-statement-2019.pdf
David Davies, London
0