Effective communication vital to addressing ALR safety concerns

12.00 | 13 December 2016 | | 2 comments

Effective communication with drivers and full engagement with stakeholders are vital to addressing safety concerns over all lane running (ALR), the Government has said.

In its response to the Transport Committee’s latest Report of Session, published on 7 December, the Government says it is mindful of the safety concerns raised by the Committee.

Despite acknowledging these concerns, the Government says there is growing evidence that ALR is providing much-needed additional capacity ‘quickly and efficiently’, while maintaining or improving safety.

When the Government published its previous response in September, the Transport Committee criticised it for ‘blatantly ignoring’ safety concerns about all-lane running schemes.

In a statement at the time, the Committee said it took ‘real issue’ with the Government’s assertion that all-lane running schemes on motorways are no different to other types of roads without hard shoulders.

The Government has promised a ‘step change’ in the way it and Highways England respond to the Transport Select Committee going forward.

Meanwhile, the Freight Transport Association (FTA) has praised the Transport Committee for addressing its concerns about ‘Red X’ compliance and proper management of the signal systems on smart motorways.

In its response, the Government wrote: “The Government continues to work with Highways England to monitor and understand the levels of compliance with Red X signals and to take the necessary steps to tackle it through a combination of education and enforcement.

“The effectiveness of the programme of work to improve driver compliance, which includes activities across the compliance 4E’s – Education, Encouragement, Engineering and Enforcement – will be assessed to ensure it delivers improvements.

“Highways England is developing a monitoring capability to specifically identify performance trends associated with key compliance issues, such as Red X.”

Photo: Highways England via Flickr used under Creative Commons. 



Comment on this story

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Report a reader comment

Order by Latest first | Oldest first | Highest rated | Lowest rated

    It does not matter how effectively the powers that be communicate with me, I shall still not be happy about there being no hard shoulder either for me to use in the event of a breakdown, or for the emergency services to use to access an incident.

    ALR is a cheap way of squeezing four lanes of traffic onto a road designed for three. Where do we go next – narrow the lanes, so that five lanes can fit into where four used to be?

    David, Suffolk
    Agree (0) | Disagree (0)

    There are none so blind as those that will not see. Perhaps the Transport Committee’s comments have shamed the government into taking a little reality peek. We shall have to wait and see if they close their eyes again afterwards.

    Pat, Wales
    Agree (0) | Disagree (0)

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.