A recently completed research project has identified two side road crossing designs that encourage drivers to give way to people crossing and waiting to cross – as required by the Highway Code since January 2022.
The project was carried out by academics at the University of the West England (UWE), with funding provided by The Road Safety Trust.
The researchers set out to understand the impacts of enhanced side road designs that both increase priority and reduce risk for people walking and cycling. It is particularly significant because of changes to the Highway Code that came into effect from 29 January 2022.
These changes mean drivers turning in or out of a side road should now give way not only to pedestrians and cyclists who are crossing, but also to waiting pedestrians and approaching cyclists.
The research team from UWE’s Centre for Transport and Society, observed behaviour at different types of side road crossing and revealed two designs where drivers were more likely to give way:
- Marked Priority crossings with so-called ‘parallel crossings’ that have a zebra for pedestrians and priority markings for the cycle track crossing.
- Design Priority crossings, also called continuous footways, where priority is reinforced by the layout and surface materials.
With both of these enhancements, people crossing did not have to yield to drivers in approximately 90% of interactions compared with 43% of interactions at conventional junctions.
The researchers found that users realise the importance of Marked Priority and Design Priority enhancements being implemented consistently and appropriately across the country in order to minimise ambiguity and confusion.
The project was led by John Parkin, professor of transport engineering and deputy director of the Centre for Transport and Society at UWE.
Professor Parkin said: “Many side road junctions are designed mainly with movement for vehicles on the carriageway in mind, and they have generous corner radii and wide carriageways. The key point is that priority for people crossing, as required by the Highway Code, is not clear from the design.
“The project explored the use of priority markings that make it clear to drivers that they need to give way to pedestrians and cyclists who are crossing a side road. These are give way markings placed before the pedestrian and/or cycle track crossing, and sometimes also a zebra crossing for pedestrians.
“The findings have been compared with previous research on priority that has been enhanced by the design having a raised footway and/or cycle track that is continuous across the side road.
“On nearly half of occasions at conventional junctions, people crossing yielded voluntarily to turning drivers. The effect of enhanced junctions was to reduce this proportion and created more occasions when drivers gave way to people crossing. Both Marked Priority designs with a zebra, and Design Priority designs (continuous footways) increased the proportion of times people did not yield to vehicles from around 50% at control sites to around 90%.”
Sonya Hurt, chief executive of The Road Safety Trust, said: “When it comes to encouraging more people to walk and cycle, safety is paramount.
“We are delighted with the outcomes from this project, including recommendations for side road crossing designs most likely to encourage drivers to give way, thereby reducing risk for those travelling by foot or on bike.”
As Professor Parkin said: “Many side road junctions are designed mainly with movement for vehicles on the carriageway in mind, and they have generous corner radii and wide carriageways. The key point is that priority for people crossing, as required by the Highway Code, is not clear from the design.”
No Local Authority I know has the money or the people resources to re-design all our major road side road junctions quickly, never mind the rest of our basic road network.
For continued personal safety, pedestrians and cyclists should continue to take a cautious approach to crossing side roads recognising that many drivers are still not aware of the new rules (or not willing to comply with them even if they are).
No point in being one of the casualties whilst this change SLOWLY seeps into the drivers mindset.
Pat, Wales
+3
Great news that there has been a breakout of common sense – if we are to change the priorities of a road junction we also need to change the road markings; anything otherwise is dangerous.
I was involved in a survey run by TRL in December 19 that researched this, curious to understand why this wasn’t considered as an option for local authorities to implement rather than change the rules with no layout change.
Ben Graham, Reading
+1
I cannot even begin to describe how ridiculous, misguided, ill-conceived and non sensical both the law change and this research is. As it stands the priorities need to be 100% REVERSED. ALL priority needs to remain with road users unless a designated crossing is in place.
On which point, there was a time when those of us with what we used to keep us safe ie Common Sense, would look at a proposal to place a designated crossing at a junction and either tut dismissively, laugh or ask ourselves which utter idiot thought that was a good idea.
Yes, of course the perspective changes due to the law change;that, however, does nothing to nullify the fact that this entire viewpoint regarding cosseting pedestrians is fatally flawed.
Two things will surely transpire, and these “academics” who came up with the junction layout are either scared to acknowledge it because there’s a financial impication, or just ignorant beyond words. The two outcomes will be. 1 pedestrians will increasingly assume priority, regardless of veracity. (it’s already happening) 2 pedestrians, cyclists, et Al will have increasingly relinquish responsibility and use every and any opportunity to blame/burden motorists.
It’s called human nature and basic psychology. Wake up. Stop this nonsense. You are already dumbing society down and it will go far far further down than you can ever imagine.
Chris Briant
--8