RAC issues child car seat plea

13.14 | 28 January 2020 | | 2 comments

Image: RAC

Parents and grandparents who transport children by car are being urged not to take any chances and always use a child car seat.

The plea comes from the RAC, on the back of a survey in which more than a fifth of respondents admitted to breaking the law by not properly securing their youngest passengers.

While the majority of those (16%) confessed to not using a car seat ‘very rarely’, 3% said they did so ‘sometimes’ and another 3% ‘regularly’.

The biggest excuse provided was not having access to the car seat as it was in another vehicle (54%) – while 15% said they didn’t use one due to the shortness of the journey.

The RAC says having the right car seat for a child is ‘essential’.

Sophie Steane, RAC Shop spokesperson, said: “Our findings show that many parents and grandparents have taken risks by not using the proper seats. 

“While many say they have only done this very occasionally and only for very short distances, you can never be sure that something bad won’t happen.

“We imagine more risks have been taken with older children than babies, but we would urge every parent and grandparent not to chance it as the thoughts of something terrible happening would be too much to bear.”

UK law dictates that a child must use a child car seat until they are 12 years old or 135cm tall, whichever comes first. Children over the age of 12 or more than 135cm tall must wear a seat belt.



Comment on this story

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Report a reader comment

Order by Latest first | Oldest first | Highest rated | Lowest rated

    The first line of the article says “Parents and grandparents who transport children by car are being urged not to take any chances and always use a child seat”. Better still, don’t rely on the child seat.. just don’t take chances. Full stop.

    Too often, I see young mothers driving their little ones around in a manner likely to end in either a a panic stop or worse, a collision i.e too close and/or too fast. Paradoxically, perhaps they would be more careful if their children were not restrained.

    Hugh Jones, Cheshire
    Agree (1) | Disagree (0)

    This is a very important release and one Good Egg will share widely.

    Yesterday we were alongside a car where an older child was in the rear seat completely unrestrained. Despite polite gesticulations (!) the father sped off.

    MAST analysis shows the oldest age group studied (8 to 11 years) had the highest rates of casualties per head of population, and this was reinforced in further RAIDS analysis.

    Increased public awareness is therefore crucial. Well done RAC

    Jan James, London
    Agree (1) | Disagree (0)

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.