StreetWise reveals consumer confidence in autonomous vehicles

13.48 | 26 August 2020 | | 3 comments

The results of one of the ‘world’s most advanced demonstrations’ of self-driving vehicles has found consumer confidence in autonomous driving technologies is high.

The StreetWise project is being led by the UK self-driving technology firm, Five, alongside TRL and Direct Line Group.

The project’s commuter trial phase involved inviting members of the public to experience being driven autonomously on a busy 13-mile route in London. 

This included shared tramways, a variety of roundabouts, cyclists, pedestrians, T-junctions, signalised pedestrian crossings and a wide variety of vulnerable road users.

Feedback reveals 96% of all participants rated their overall journey experience as positive to very positive, with 86% stating that their expectations had been exceeded. 

The project team says factors that drove these results included the self-driving system’s ability to keep a safe distance, perceive and manoeuvre safely around obstacles and hazards, drive like a human and manage roundabouts.

This is in addition to the participants’ trust in the ‘diligence and professionalism of the safety driver in each vehicle’.

Stan Boland, co-founder and CEO of Five, said: “We are thrilled with the outcomes from the StreetWise project.

“Strong consumer trust and enthusiasm to adopt this technology in our daily lives is welcome news for the self-driving industry. It’s also testament to the need for a relentless focus on safety in how we develop and test it. 

“The experience we gained in building a completely new self-driving system, including sophisticated deep learning perception and planning technologies, required us to build a prototypical cloud-based technology to help develop and test our system to a measurable level ahead of time.”

As well as the technology development, the StreetWise project also highlighted the remaining hurdles in establishing the regulatory landscape, delivering clarity on what testing should be done.

David Hynd, chief scientist for TRL, said: “The safety of not only the vehicles involved, but also of the passengers and other road users is of paramount importance. This is why the safety case for the StreetWise trials was the most advanced version used in any trial to date. 

“Moving forwards, it is essential that the wider industry comes together to build on what we have achieved so far, so that we not only learn from our combined findings, but also so we can build the framework whereby we harmonise the standards for a future that includes automated vehicles.”



Comment on this story

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Report a reader comment

Order by Latest first | Oldest first | Highest rated | Lowest rated

    Unfortunately, autonomous vehicles will only be as good as the programmer’s imagination. The data to improve the performance will come – inevitably – from crashes resulting from the inability of the programmer to imagine just how things go wrong on the road.

    Anyone else noticed the clearly defined paint markings in the photo? How are automatic lane keeping systems going to work when the paint markings between lanes or between vehicle and cycle lanes are almost obliterated by wear?

    Kevin Williams / Survival Skills, London
    Agree (8) | Disagree (0)

    Ironically, the bus in the photo which is being driven by a human, is far too close to the autonomous vehicle in front and would not be able to stop in time if the car in front stopped suddenly. Would the autonomous vehicle ‘know’ what to do in these circumstances as a human might?

    Hugh Jones, Cheshire
    Agree (4) | Disagree (11)

    Autonomous vehicles are like psychopaths, they operate without a conscience and no empathy. They will happily take you down as they don’t operate like human brains do but only according to the programmed algorithms responding to basic sensor i/p and GPS which enable them to operate over a limited range of scenarios, they don’t learn (neural nets are just a short cut look up table of finite possibilities). People are being mislead by the hyperbole sales pitch and ignorance.
    Our roads are dangerous enough as it is than to have these primitive decision machines move a ton + of metal about of their own accord, mixed with human traffic. Perhaps if the CEOs were held personally liable, financially and legally for accidents and deaths they would think very hard before imposing this trash upon us.

    Brian, Nottingham
    Agree (16) | Disagree (1)

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.